You know how I keep saying that Romney deliberately threw the 2012 election? That he was doing everything he could to lose? Here's proof positive: this ad was created by the RNC just after the Benghazi attack on September 11. It's devastating to Obama. It would have ended his campaign right then and there.
But what did "Mittens the Kitten" Romney do? Told the RNC not to run it. If they had, it would have been all over for Hussein Obama. Romney would have won the election. But he didn't. Why? Because he didn't want to win. Why not? I suspect he was getting paid to lose. If he had won, he would not have gotten his big payoff for throwing the election. And he couldn't have that.
Romney is a professional loser, hand-picked by the Professional Loser Party. And he did his job - he lost. Why shouldn't he? After all, John McCain threw the election for Obama in 2008, so why shouldn't Romney do it in 2012?
When 2016 rolls around, we dare not let the GOP call the shots with their next Professional Loser. We must have our own candidate, run our own ads, and put the truth out there. Otherwise we get four years of Hitlery Clinton. And considering that she left Chris Stevens, a personal friend of hers, to die at the hands of terrorists, she sure as hell won't do anything good for this country.