Obama's fervent supporters, the unions, are suddenly getting bitch-slapped with Obamacare taxes and penalties....and they don't like it:
"20,000 longshoremen are threatening to strike over a new Obamacare tax. Obamacare imposes a 40 percent tax on health benefits deemed too generous by the government. Health benefits exceeding $10,200 a year in value for individuals or $27,500 for families are defined as “Cadillac” plans and are subject to the tax. Health benefits for longshoremen exceed $40,000 per employee, meaning the union would be served an enormous tax bill when the penalty is imposed in 2018."
http://moonbattery.com/?p=55114
Hey union members, did you honestly think you would be spared the punishing taxes and fees of Obamacare? Ha!
Suckers!
What did Obama tell you: "If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your plan"? And you fell for it. Or did you think that only "the rich" would get taxed? Yeah, well, YOU are "rich" according to Obama.
I love listening to liberals scream. It's music to my ears. Now let's see if they'll finally rise up against Obama and Obamacare. Doubtful, though. They'll just move on to the next hoax.
Showing posts with label Liberal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
Monday, July 15, 2013
The Rise of the New Nazis
Today is the second day of the protests against the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the self-defense shooting of Trayvon Martin. Instead of respecting the judgement of the jury, the screaming leftists have taken to the streets. What started as merely a march has turned into violence and arrests.
But this is portending something more worrisome: what the protestors are becoming. Take a look at the photo below. This is from New York where the protestors are blocking the streets:
Notice all the hands, raised up to one person who's speaking? Gee....where have we seen that before?
What we're seeing is the rise of the New Nazis: bands of screaming kids who have sworn their allegiance to a cause, whether it's right or not.
The liberals of today are nothing but easily-led sheep. All it takes is one emotional issue and constant coverage by the left-wing biased media, and the rule of law is null and void. This must be stopped. If we want our country to survive and not descend into a pit of dictatorship where every word is monitored and punishment is swift, then we have to stop this stupidity right now.
How? Well, I can make a few suggestions, but the NSA is probably reading this blog. So let's just say that I'm going to encourage people to sit down together and have peaceful discussions over flowers and herbal tea and have an open and honest discussion about race and peace and harmony. Just make sure you have your firearms handy because whenever a conservative gets the better of a liberal in an argument, the liberal starts throwing punches.
But this is portending something more worrisome: what the protestors are becoming. Take a look at the photo below. This is from New York where the protestors are blocking the streets:
Notice all the hands, raised up to one person who's speaking? Gee....where have we seen that before?
Oh yeah. We've seen it here:
What we're seeing is the rise of the New Nazis: bands of screaming kids who have sworn their allegiance to a cause, whether it's right or not.
The liberals of today are nothing but easily-led sheep. All it takes is one emotional issue and constant coverage by the left-wing biased media, and the rule of law is null and void. This must be stopped. If we want our country to survive and not descend into a pit of dictatorship where every word is monitored and punishment is swift, then we have to stop this stupidity right now.
How? Well, I can make a few suggestions, but the NSA is probably reading this blog. So let's just say that I'm going to encourage people to sit down together and have peaceful discussions over flowers and herbal tea and have an open and honest discussion about race and peace and harmony. Just make sure you have your firearms handy because whenever a conservative gets the better of a liberal in an argument, the liberal starts throwing punches.
Sunday, July 14, 2013
Zimmerman Acquittal: Libs Hoisted by Their Own Petard
George Zimmerman has been found not guilty on all charges of the shooting death of Trayvon Martin. And predictably, like the 4-year-olds that they are, the leftists are screeeeeeaaaming about how it was "injustice".
It's justice all right. All of the evidence pointed to George Zimmerman's account being the truth, and no matter what the left says, Trayvon attacked Zimmerman and got shot for his actions.
But here's the real reason the leftists are really upset: they can't turn this into a racial thing because no white men were involved.
So the libs are in a quandry because there's nobody to blame. Oh, what to do, what to do? Can't blame the evil white people because none were involved.
The leftists have painted themselves into a corner. Here we have two minorities (protected classes Who Can Do No Wrong) who clashed and had an outcome. Since they're minorities, though, racism wasn't involved. The jury was composed of all women and the judge was a woman (a protected class Who Can Do No Wrong).
The libs have been hoisted by their own petard. All their work trying to make the white race the evil doers of the world and all minorities as saints has backfired - a minority is dead and another minority is acquitted and goes free.
It's a dark day for the liberals. Their beloved schema of All Minorities Are Guilt-Free Because Of The Color Of Their Skin has fallen apart today.
It's justice all right. All of the evidence pointed to George Zimmerman's account being the truth, and no matter what the left says, Trayvon attacked Zimmerman and got shot for his actions.
But here's the real reason the leftists are really upset: they can't turn this into a racial thing because no white men were involved.
- Zimmerman is Hispanic: A Race That Can't Be Racist.
- Martin is black: A Race That Can't Be Racist.
- The jury was all-women: A Gender That Does No Wrong.
So the libs are in a quandry because there's nobody to blame. Oh, what to do, what to do? Can't blame the evil white people because none were involved.
The leftists have painted themselves into a corner. Here we have two minorities (protected classes Who Can Do No Wrong) who clashed and had an outcome. Since they're minorities, though, racism wasn't involved. The jury was composed of all women and the judge was a woman (a protected class Who Can Do No Wrong).
The libs have been hoisted by their own petard. All their work trying to make the white race the evil doers of the world and all minorities as saints has backfired - a minority is dead and another minority is acquitted and goes free.
It's a dark day for the liberals. Their beloved schema of All Minorities Are Guilt-Free Because Of The Color Of Their Skin has fallen apart today.
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Sequester Flops, Media Blames Bush
The LameStream Media is in full propaganda mode.
There's an article in The Week about how "the GOP must come to terms with Bush's presidency". It is, of course, a hit piece on Bush.
It's obvious what this phony "story" is all about: It's an attempt to distract people from the fact that all the "disasters" that Obama claimed would happen because of the sequester, didn't happen.
The only thing that happened was that the feds didn't get as big a pay raise as they wanted. So now they're trying to cover their tracks by bringing up a president who's been out of office for more than four years.
What's really happening is that The People are catching on that it's OBAMA who's a disaster. His total incompetence is on full display and The People can see it. Unemployment is still at record highs, gas prices are at record highs, and a record number of people are still in poverty and on food stamps.
And to top it off, every 1-2 months there is yet another fiscal crisis. In January it was the "fiscal cliff". In February everyone's taxes went up and paychecks got smaller. In March it was the sequester. April it's going to be the debt limit again. And every time it's argue, argue, argue, and then raise taxes.
This fiscal irresponsibility is Obama's fault. This didn't happen during the Bush administration. It's because Obama has no idea how to govern and the Democrats haven't passed a budget in four years. So stop with the distractions, LameStream Media. All your distraction techniques don't change the fact that our country is going down the tubes and it's Obama's fault.
.
There's an article in The Week about how "the GOP must come to terms with Bush's presidency". It is, of course, a hit piece on Bush.
It's obvious what this phony "story" is all about: It's an attempt to distract people from the fact that all the "disasters" that Obama claimed would happen because of the sequester, didn't happen.
- 170 Million people didn't get laid off.
- Security lines aren't longer at the airport.
- Millions of children didn't lose their health care.
- Thousands of cops and firefighters weren't laid off.
- Janitors at Obama's most recent speech didn't get a pay cut.
The only thing that happened was that the feds didn't get as big a pay raise as they wanted. So now they're trying to cover their tracks by bringing up a president who's been out of office for more than four years.
What's really happening is that The People are catching on that it's OBAMA who's a disaster. His total incompetence is on full display and The People can see it. Unemployment is still at record highs, gas prices are at record highs, and a record number of people are still in poverty and on food stamps.
And to top it off, every 1-2 months there is yet another fiscal crisis. In January it was the "fiscal cliff". In February everyone's taxes went up and paychecks got smaller. In March it was the sequester. April it's going to be the debt limit again. And every time it's argue, argue, argue, and then raise taxes.
This fiscal irresponsibility is Obama's fault. This didn't happen during the Bush administration. It's because Obama has no idea how to govern and the Democrats haven't passed a budget in four years. So stop with the distractions, LameStream Media. All your distraction techniques don't change the fact that our country is going down the tubes and it's Obama's fault.
.
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Why Liberals Like the IRS Enforcing Obamacare
The Obama administration is transferring $500 Million to the IRS for them to begin collecting taxes to enforce Obamacare. In addition, they're hiring 4,000 new agents to make sure they collect. Why is this?
The Obama administration realizes how unpopular the health care reform law is and recognizes that it needs an iron fist to enforce its provisions. And the best iron fist is the IRS. They're really good at making people cough up money. If they suspect you haven't paid enough tax they'll lock up your accounts, take everything, and throw you out into the street.
Why do the liberals think this is a great idea? Because it fits how liberals think.
Liberalism is not about opportunity. Liberalism is not about advancement or achievement or anything along those lines. Liberalism is about punishment. Specifically, punishing their "enemies", and "enemy" is defined as "anyone who's not a liberal".
What's every liberal politician's battle cry? "Tax the Rich!", better known as "punish the rich!". Have you EVER heard a liberal politician say "Steve Jobs became wealthy, and you can too!" Nope. "Punish the rich!" is always their mantra.
Or how about this whole Trayvon Martin thing? "Punish the racist!". Or Arizona's SB 1070, designed to keep out illegal aliens? "Punish Arizona with boycotts!" It's never "let's understand the problem first". It's "Punish, punish punish! They don't think like me, so they must be punished!"
So putting the IRS in charge of Obamacare makes perfect sense. The liberals can lie back on their government subsidized sofas and watch their government-subsidized TVS watching how the IRS is clamping down on some evil rich person and making him/her pay his/her "fair share" in taxes. And life will be good for the liberal.
That's why I say the only practical method of dealing with liberals is to arrest all of them, chain them together at the ankles, and put them on the southern border building the brick wall with their bare hands for 12 hours a day, seven days a week.
Saturday, April 7, 2012
Jan Brewer Lays Into California Over Illegal Immigrants
On Thursday, March 29, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer chastised California for that state’s push to get Senate Bill 1070 killed by the U.S. Supreme Court. Part of the California argument is that Arizona’s crackdown on illegal immigrants will send them to the Golden State.
Jerry Brown admits illegals cause problems...
Jerry Brown, Governor of California, has just backed himself into a corner. On the one hand, he admits that illegals are a problem. If they weren't, why is he concerned that they'll flock to CA? But on the other hand, he doesn't do anything about illegals in his own state, so the problem remains. So what does he do? He tries to stop AZ from fixing their illegal-alien problems.
...but he resorts to very typical liberal behavior:
Jerry Brown is demonstrating very typical liberal behavior: he won't solve his own problems, so he demonizes the people who ARE solving problems. Rather than making hard decisions and taking the steps to solve the problem of illegals in California, Jerry Brown is attempting to demonize Arizona in hopes that CA looks good by comparison. That's what liberals do.
Jan slaps Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown
Naturally, Jan Brewer isn't taking this lying down. In the article, she says:
"Their apparent concern is that SB 1070 would result in illegal aliens seeking safe haven in more accommodating locales elsewhere. Why the objection? Given their complaints about SB 1070, I would think these states would welcome those present illegally with open arms.”"
You tell 'em Jan! I couldn't have said it better myself. I say: "F" off, Jerry Brown. Fix your own immigration problems, and then talk to us about ours. Meanwhile, we'll solve our problems without your help.
.
Jerry Brown admits illegals cause problems...
Jerry Brown, Governor of California, has just backed himself into a corner. On the one hand, he admits that illegals are a problem. If they weren't, why is he concerned that they'll flock to CA? But on the other hand, he doesn't do anything about illegals in his own state, so the problem remains. So what does he do? He tries to stop AZ from fixing their illegal-alien problems.
...but he resorts to very typical liberal behavior:
Jerry Brown is demonstrating very typical liberal behavior: he won't solve his own problems, so he demonizes the people who ARE solving problems. Rather than making hard decisions and taking the steps to solve the problem of illegals in California, Jerry Brown is attempting to demonize Arizona in hopes that CA looks good by comparison. That's what liberals do.
Jan slaps Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown
Naturally, Jan Brewer isn't taking this lying down. In the article, she says:
"Their apparent concern is that SB 1070 would result in illegal aliens seeking safe haven in more accommodating locales elsewhere. Why the objection? Given their complaints about SB 1070, I would think these states would welcome those present illegally with open arms.”"
You tell 'em Jan! I couldn't have said it better myself. I say: "F" off, Jerry Brown. Fix your own immigration problems, and then talk to us about ours. Meanwhile, we'll solve our problems without your help.
.
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Obama: Spread the wealth around!
Barack Hussein Obama's assets are valued at up to $12 Million, according to an article in the Kansas City Star.
According to the Star:
"The couple's assets...were valued at a maximum of $7.5 million in 2009" and "Royalties from Obama's books, "Dreams From My Father" and "Audacity of Hope," totaled between about $1 million and $6 million."
So why isn't Obama spreading around this wealth?
During his presidential campaign, Obama met Joe the Plumber and made the famous quote: "... I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody."". So why isn't he spreading his own wealth around?
Oh yeah.....he's a liberal. What he meant was "I'll take money from everyone except me and spread it around". This is why you never believe anything a liberal says, and you certainly don't vote for them. They'll screw you every time.
According to the Star:
"The couple's assets...were valued at a maximum of $7.5 million in 2009" and "Royalties from Obama's books, "Dreams From My Father" and "Audacity of Hope," totaled between about $1 million and $6 million."
So why isn't Obama spreading around this wealth?
During his presidential campaign, Obama met Joe the Plumber and made the famous quote: "... I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody."". So why isn't he spreading his own wealth around?
Oh yeah.....he's a liberal. What he meant was "I'll take money from everyone except me and spread it around". This is why you never believe anything a liberal says, and you certainly don't vote for them. They'll screw you every time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)