The 2016 Election was Thrown from the Start....until now.
(Part One is here)
Next, the Democrats:
Hillary was the chosen candidate for the Democrats ever since she and Bill Clinton left office many years ago. During the years of GW Bush, she became a Senator and made herself obvious by raucously shrieking out against Bush whenever she could. When Bush was out of office she ran for president, hoping her loudness would carry her through. She was not expecting Barack Obama to be pushed to the front by the Mainstream Media. So after a short fight she dropped out of the race and let Obama be elected.
During that time she served as the Secretary of State where she did nothing but let four Americans be butchered by terrorists and then lie about it. But while all this was happening, she and the GOP were carefully laying the groundwork for her election. The two parties got together and started their subtle campaigning to make Hillary look like the Chosen One, and Bush to be the Fall Guy.
Hillary’s Past Catches Up With Her:
Two things happened that have Hillary losing in the polls.
1. The email scandal.
Hillary has been caught red-handed in a huge scandal that involves national security. She’s been accused of selling American uranium to the Russians, and selling arms to the rebels in Syria via Benghazi. Congressional investigations into these matters have revealed Hillary for who she really is: conniving, vindictive, lying, and uncaring. Her shouting “What difference does it make???” may have been intended to make the Republicans look petty, but it backfired. Since it had been proven that Hillary lied to cover up the Benghazi killings, millions of Democrats saw her as she really is, and they saw *their* kids being sent off to die in a war that Hillary most likely had set up so that she could make a big profit from it. And no parent, with even a shred of love for their children, wants that.
2. The rise of Bernie Sanders.
The dumbing-down of American children has created the “gimme” society of young people. They don’t want to work – they want everything handed to them. They see anyone who’s successful as “evil”, and they want the worked-hard-for salaries taken away from those evil people and given to them.
But even the dumbest of “gimme” kids can see that Hillary is a grasping, clutching, in-it-for-herself witch that would, at best, dole out only crumbs to the serfs. The gimme generation wants it all, and it’s obvious that Hillary would keep as much of the money as she could.
So in comes Bernie Sanders. Bernie is an outspoken socialist. His entire platform is “I’ll raise taxes to 90% on the rich people and give it to all the “poor” people”. Free college! Free everything! This rings true with the gimme generation. They expect everything to be free, and so they side with Bernie. As a result, Bernie is surging in the polls and Hillary is dropping behind.
But the DNC is determined to place Hillary as president, so they’re doing everything they can to prevent her being seen as a grabby witch. Specifically, they’re NOT letting her out into public, and they’re NOT holding debates. They’re just going to push her into the nomination no matter what the voters say.
This is not going over well with the Democrat voters. They’re demanding more debates between the candidates, and the DNC is turning them down. The DNC is determined to push Hillary into the nomination, and they’re using their tried-and-true method of “do what we tell you to do, serfs”. Unfortunately for them, they’re getting pushback. If the DNC forces Hillary into the nomination, a lot of Democrat voters will stay home and not vote. Hillary will not get elected. Bernie Sanders will have a shot at the presidency because of Democrats either doing a write-in campaign or stuffing the ballot boxes.
In Summary:
The political elites thought they had the outcome of the 2016 election decided many years ago. Unfortunately for them, those plans have been thrown into turmoil. The American People are speaking out, they’ve found candidates they prefer, and they’re not sitting idly by.
What will happen next? That remains to be seen. For the Republicans, I see Donald Trump surging ahead until he’s nominated. Jeb Bush is sinking in the polls and his campaign financers are beginning to back out. So if the GOP tries to push Bush into the nomination, there will be more than idle complaining; there will be disruptive action: marches, protests, phone-banks, etc. If that doesn’t work, then there will probably be a write-in campaign and Trump will be elected no matter what the GOP wants.
As for the Democrats, Bernie Sanders will keep surging forward. Hillary is sinking in the polls, as evidenced by her campaign appearances are her speaking to half-empty rooms. However the DNC will continue to push her as the nominee. Come hell or high water, they’re going to push Hillary into that position. If they do, there will be violence in the streets; all the groups that want socialism will be in the streets setting fires and destroying buildings, just like they’ve been trained to do by the DNC. And on election night, a lot of Democrats will stay home because they’re tired of being conned by the DNC into voting for a candidate they don’t want.
Final Analysis:
The 2016 election is the death-knell for both the GOP and the DNC. Americans have had enough of the political elites telling them “We know best. Sit down, shut up, give us all your money, and do as we tell you”. With the rejection of the “chosen by the elites” candidates and the surge in popularity of the new candidates, the old politics is dead. Washington no longer has a grip on the American people. The old politicians would be wise to pack their bags and get out while the getting is good.
Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
Monday, September 21, 2015
Thursday, September 10, 2015
Democrats: Obama was a Fluke!
An interesting shift has happened in the people the Democrats pick for presidential candidates. It's one that represents how the Democrats think
Let's go back to 2008 and the rise of Hussein Obama. John McCain was portrayed as an old white guy; an old and out-of-touch white guy who couldn't relate to the young diverse voters. Obama was the big new thing: a young "leader" who could inject life into America. During his first four years that's all the media talked about: How Obama had brought in the "young" vote. Obama was the leader of the Millenials - the future leaders of the country!
Now we're in 2016: eight years later. Who are the candidates?
1. Hillary: a 69-year-old white woman.
2. Bernie Sanders: a 74-year-old white guy.
3. Joe Biden: a 72-year-old white guy.
What happened to the "youth" vote? What happened to the "young leaders"? After 8 years of a young black guy as president, why are the Democrats switching back to old white people for candidates?
Good question, isn't it?
Obama was a Fluke. An Anomaly.
The Democrats didn't want Obama but he had too much momentum, so they went along with his campaign. He's an unqualified idiot and the Democrats knew it, but they weren't going to say anything because if they *did* say something Al Sharpton would turn his horde of angry black people against them and they'd lose their cushy jobs. Now that his eight years are up, they're going right back to what they really wanted, which is putting old white people into office so they can continue raising taxes and screwing the public.
There's no "Obama" in this election cycle, and any potential Obama who tries to campaign will get quickly shut down. Why? Because there's too much at stake here to trust the country with another young upstart. Obama stirred up racial hatred and public unrest to a level the Democrats weren't expecting, and the conservatives revolted and are pushing Trump - a capitalist who's cutting through the political bullcrap and laying out a plan for the individual American. So now the Dems have to put an old white person in charge so they can continue their *quiet* move toward socialism without some upstart radical stirring up unrest so that The People revolt.
Democrat Voters: You're Being Scammed
So if you're a young and/or diverse Democrat and you believe that the Democrats represent you and your viewpoints, think again. Take a look at the presidential candidates the Democrats have. The next time Bernie/Biden/Hillary raise their old white heads and give a speech, just remember: they're a representation of the true nature of the Democrats' political machine. You don't matter to them. You're just a cog who has no say in their march to socialism.
.
Let's go back to 2008 and the rise of Hussein Obama. John McCain was portrayed as an old white guy; an old and out-of-touch white guy who couldn't relate to the young diverse voters. Obama was the big new thing: a young "leader" who could inject life into America. During his first four years that's all the media talked about: How Obama had brought in the "young" vote. Obama was the leader of the Millenials - the future leaders of the country!
Now we're in 2016: eight years later. Who are the candidates?
1. Hillary: a 69-year-old white woman.
2. Bernie Sanders: a 74-year-old white guy.
3. Joe Biden: a 72-year-old white guy.
What happened to the "youth" vote? What happened to the "young leaders"? After 8 years of a young black guy as president, why are the Democrats switching back to old white people for candidates?
Good question, isn't it?
Obama was a Fluke. An Anomaly.
The Democrats didn't want Obama but he had too much momentum, so they went along with his campaign. He's an unqualified idiot and the Democrats knew it, but they weren't going to say anything because if they *did* say something Al Sharpton would turn his horde of angry black people against them and they'd lose their cushy jobs. Now that his eight years are up, they're going right back to what they really wanted, which is putting old white people into office so they can continue raising taxes and screwing the public.
There's no "Obama" in this election cycle, and any potential Obama who tries to campaign will get quickly shut down. Why? Because there's too much at stake here to trust the country with another young upstart. Obama stirred up racial hatred and public unrest to a level the Democrats weren't expecting, and the conservatives revolted and are pushing Trump - a capitalist who's cutting through the political bullcrap and laying out a plan for the individual American. So now the Dems have to put an old white person in charge so they can continue their *quiet* move toward socialism without some upstart radical stirring up unrest so that The People revolt.
Democrat Voters: You're Being Scammed
So if you're a young and/or diverse Democrat and you believe that the Democrats represent you and your viewpoints, think again. Take a look at the presidential candidates the Democrats have. The next time Bernie/Biden/Hillary raise their old white heads and give a speech, just remember: they're a representation of the true nature of the Democrats' political machine. You don't matter to them. You're just a cog who has no say in their march to socialism.
.
Saturday, September 5, 2015
Democrat Frankenstein Attacks its Creator Again
"Black Lives Matter" shuts down California Governor Jerry Brown's office:
"Occupiers from Black Lives Matter and the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) descended upon California’s capitol Wednesday by the hundreds, demanding state legislators pass a new bill on racial profiling, and calling on Governor Jerry Brown to sign it. Chants from the crowd shown in video posted to social media included, “Justice, If we don’t get it, shut it down” ."
Once again, we see the Democrat Frankenstein's Monster turning on its creator. Jerry and the Democrats have been nurturing these radical crowds for decades and targeting them toward conservatives. These are
the same people who rioted in Oakland, San Francisco, and Los Angeles; smashing store windows, burning police cars, assaulting people, and shutting down freeways. It was fine then because they were speaking "the will of the people". The problem is, when you pander to groups like this they'll turn on you. And now they've turned on the Democrats.
Jerry Brown is facing a real problem. He's going to have to address this problem sooner or later because now they're invading his precious fortress where he used to be safe from these unwashed masses. So I wonder: When he addresses the mob, is he going to deliver the same kind of condescending put-down to this group that he does to the people who don't want his high-speed rail or increased taxes? I doubt it.
It doesn't matter anyway. No matter what Jerry or the Democrats say, it won't be good enough. The crowd will just get bigger, louder, and more violent. Congratulations, Jerry. Your chickens have come home to roost.
(Here's Part One, in case you're interested.)
.
"Occupiers from Black Lives Matter and the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) descended upon California’s capitol Wednesday by the hundreds, demanding state legislators pass a new bill on racial profiling, and calling on Governor Jerry Brown to sign it. Chants from the crowd shown in video posted to social media included, “Justice, If we don’t get it, shut it down” ."
Once again, we see the Democrat Frankenstein's Monster turning on its creator. Jerry and the Democrats have been nurturing these radical crowds for decades and targeting them toward conservatives. These are the same people who rioted in Oakland, San Francisco, and Los Angeles; smashing store windows, burning police cars, assaulting people, and shutting down freeways. It was fine then because they were speaking "the will of the people". The problem is, when you pander to groups like this they'll turn on you. And now they've turned on the Democrats.
Jerry Brown is facing a real problem. He's going to have to address this problem sooner or later because now they're invading his precious fortress where he used to be safe from these unwashed masses. So I wonder: When he addresses the mob, is he going to deliver the same kind of condescending put-down to this group that he does to the people who don't want his high-speed rail or increased taxes? I doubt it.
It doesn't matter anyway. No matter what Jerry or the Democrats say, it won't be good enough. The crowd will just get bigger, louder, and more violent. Congratulations, Jerry. Your chickens have come home to roost.
(Here's Part One, in case you're interested.)
.
Sunday, July 19, 2015
Democrat Frankenstein Attacks Its Creator
The Democrat's Frankenstein's monster has turned on its creator.
Last Saturday, Democrat candidates Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley spoke at a rally of the Netroots. Or at least, they *tried* to speak. Partway into their presentations, screeching screaming black activists shouted down both Marty O'Malley and Bernie Sanders.
From the article:
"Angry, emotional Black Lives Matter activists took the stage to screech that black people are “in a state of emergency” over police violence, a position that has been shown to be statistically inaccurate but that led to violent clashes and riots in cities like Ferguson and Baltimore, where O’Malley served as mayor. As people shouted from the audience at him, O’Malley tried to respond but was continually shouted down."
Ha! It sucks to be on the receiving end, doesn't it, leftists? Welcome to what you created! Did you honestly think the emotionally-driven activists would focus just on conservatives? If so, you're idiots. They focus on ALL white people - so you're the enemy no matter how much free stuff you give them.
Then there's this:
>Both discussions were moderated by revered “Undocuqueer” journalist Jose Antonio Vargas. On his Facebook page, Vargas gave his thoughts on the event: "I wish I had more time with both O’Malley and U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders. I particularly wanted to ask Sanders about his positions on gun control, climate change, and LGBTQ rights."<
So Sanders and O'Malley face not only irate blacks, but angry illegals and gay activists too. And these activists demand answers to every issue that the Dems have flung at the Republicans: gun control, "police brutality", climate change, and "gay rights".
HAHAHAHAHA! Good luck coming up with an "acceptable" answer to those, you stupid liberal politicians! You'll find out that there are *no* acceptable answers for screaming lefty activists! You'll be put through the wringer giving them answers that will only make them angrier, louder, and more violent.
I look forward to watching Bernie and O'Malley drown in the sea of slime that they created.
.
Last Saturday, Democrat candidates Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley spoke at a rally of the Netroots. Or at least, they *tried* to speak. Partway into their presentations, screeching screaming black activists shouted down both Marty O'Malley and Bernie Sanders.
From the article:
"Angry, emotional Black Lives Matter activists took the stage to screech that black people are “in a state of emergency” over police violence, a position that has been shown to be statistically inaccurate but that led to violent clashes and riots in cities like Ferguson and Baltimore, where O’Malley served as mayor. As people shouted from the audience at him, O’Malley tried to respond but was continually shouted down."
Ha! It sucks to be on the receiving end, doesn't it, leftists? Welcome to what you created! Did you honestly think the emotionally-driven activists would focus just on conservatives? If so, you're idiots. They focus on ALL white people - so you're the enemy no matter how much free stuff you give them.
Then there's this:
>Both discussions were moderated by revered “Undocuqueer” journalist Jose Antonio Vargas. On his Facebook page, Vargas gave his thoughts on the event: "I wish I had more time with both O’Malley and U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders. I particularly wanted to ask Sanders about his positions on gun control, climate change, and LGBTQ rights."<
So Sanders and O'Malley face not only irate blacks, but angry illegals and gay activists too. And these activists demand answers to every issue that the Dems have flung at the Republicans: gun control, "police brutality", climate change, and "gay rights".
HAHAHAHAHA! Good luck coming up with an "acceptable" answer to those, you stupid liberal politicians! You'll find out that there are *no* acceptable answers for screaming lefty activists! You'll be put through the wringer giving them answers that will only make them angrier, louder, and more violent.
I look forward to watching Bernie and O'Malley drown in the sea of slime that they created.
.
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Bernie Sanders: Raise Taxes to 90%!
Bernie Sanders, Communist candidate for the Democrat Party, wants to tax "the rich" at 90%.
You
go first, Bernie. Let's see you pay 90% of all your income into the
government: your salary, your perks, your other income (like rental
property), - ALL of it: 90% goes to the government. Then convert all
your assets like your multiple houses, yachts, etc. into cash and pay
90% of that to the government. C'mon Bernie, show us the courage of
your convictions.
Bernie's argument is: "It worked in the 1950's". OK, fine! Let's go back to the 1950's. Let's bring back ALL the things you love about the 50's. Such things as:
- Racial segregation.
- No women's lib: they cooked, cleaned, and raised the kids.
- Men ruled the household. What they said was law.
- Children were disciplined. They could get spanked by teachers, cops, anyone.
- Television didn't exist.
- No gun control: everyone could carry a weapon out in the open.
- A huge reduction in taxes. At least 75% of the taxes that exist now didn't exist then.
- A huge reduction in regulations. At least 75% of the regulations that exist now didn't exist then.
- No pollution regulations.
- No environmental regulations.
- No gays.
- No welfare.
- No government programs like food stamps.
- Everyone went into the military.
- Everyone went to church.
- Girls stayed home until they were married.
- Men had to prove their worth to the father before they could even date their daughters. If they wanted to marry the daughter, they had to prove they had a good job, and they had to get permission from the father.
- No pre-marital sex.
- Many marriages were arranged. The girls had no choice.
- Illegal aliens were rounded up and deported en masse. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wetback
If the liberals want to bring back the 1950's
taxation, then they can bring back ALL of the 50's. I'm sure no liberals will complain. Because it isn't
just one thing that made the 50's work - it was a lot of things.
If Bernie is unwilling to do that, then he can stuff it.
.
Thursday, May 21, 2015
Leftists Begin Their Campaign of Fear-Mongering
The San Jose Liberal Mercury newspaper printed an article last Wednesday calling Rand Paul and Lindsey Graham the "faces of fear". Why? Because the Liberal Mercury doesn't like the fact that both Paul and Graham are Republicans and they don't approve of Hussein Obama's foreign policy and response to ISIS.
Liberals are so predictable:
Whenever the Republicans start to get a foothold, the liberals respond
with the meme of "fear-mongering".
Setting
aside all the riots and shootings we've had in the US lately thanks to
Obama and his buddies, we have every reason to be fearful of ISIS. So
far they've beheaded four Americans in the Middle East. In addition,
they're killing Christians by the hundreds. They've also killed French
people as well. Plus, we just had two ISIS-inspired terrorists try to attack an art
show in Texas..but they got shot dead by the Texas PD. And let's not
forget that ISIS has threatened the libs' Lord and Savior Barack Hussein
Obama. So the threat is very real.
But that's what happens when the Liberal Merc puts a 22-year-old
new-journalism-graduate in as a "political correspondent"; she writes whatever they
tell her to write.
When she prattles on and on about how the GOP is criticizing Obama's foreign policy, I respond "*What* foreign policy??"
Hussein's only foreign policy is "Let ISIS kill everyone. I don't care
because I have a golf game at noon". But, as always, the libs are too
stupid to see that. And the GOP is too cowardly to shut them up. The problem is, this time their "fear-mongering" meme could lead to hundreds of dead Americans because the leftists just can't let go of their hatred of Republicans long enough to see that there's real danger to be concerned about.
But since ISIS isn't refusing to bake cakes for gay couples, all the shootings, beheadings, rapes, etc, just don't appear on the liberals' radar.
.
Sunday, April 5, 2015
Obamacare-Buyers Getting Screwed at Tax Time
There was a recent article by the AP titled: "Tax refunds for many take hit from health law". It's about how many taxpayers are getting screwed by Obamacare penalties and charges that they weren't expecting.
One sucker...I mean...Obamacare buyer said: ""I was expecting to get dinged a little bit, but I was actually kind of surprised when it came down that much".
Many years ago, when Obama was forcing Obamacare through Congress without even consulting the Republicans, the conservatives said that this would happen. Workers' hours would be cut, premiums would skyrocket, taxes would increase, and the IRS would slam everyone who bought Obamacare.
And we were right. Why? It's in the numbers, not in the emotions. But were we listened to? Oh, no. "Racists!" the liberals screamed. "You don't like Obamacare because Obama's black!" they wailed.
Now it's come back to bite them. They're paying the piper, and will continue to pay because they just can't let go of their god-like image of Obama. They're being F-ed up the backside and their little childish minds won't let them admit they were wrong.
So enjoy getting screwed, liberals. You voted for Obama, you danced in the streets when Obamacare was passed, and now you're getting your comeuppance for not listening to the adults when you had the chance.
And the only thing I leave you libs with now is: Obama lied to you about Obamacare, and it's obvious now. Just last week he said that he had swung some big deal with Iran and that there was no threat of them getting a nuclear weapon. Considering that he lied openly to you about Obamacare, are you going to believe his current comments about an 'agreement' with a known terrorist country that openly hangs gays, stones women to death, and swears that they'll destroy a sovereign nation?
.
One sucker...I mean...Obamacare buyer said: ""I was expecting to get dinged a little bit, but I was actually kind of surprised when it came down that much".
Many years ago, when Obama was forcing Obamacare through Congress without even consulting the Republicans, the conservatives said that this would happen. Workers' hours would be cut, premiums would skyrocket, taxes would increase, and the IRS would slam everyone who bought Obamacare.
And we were right. Why? It's in the numbers, not in the emotions. But were we listened to? Oh, no. "Racists!" the liberals screamed. "You don't like Obamacare because Obama's black!" they wailed.
Now it's come back to bite them. They're paying the piper, and will continue to pay because they just can't let go of their god-like image of Obama. They're being F-ed up the backside and their little childish minds won't let them admit they were wrong.
So enjoy getting screwed, liberals. You voted for Obama, you danced in the streets when Obamacare was passed, and now you're getting your comeuppance for not listening to the adults when you had the chance.
And the only thing I leave you libs with now is: Obama lied to you about Obamacare, and it's obvious now. Just last week he said that he had swung some big deal with Iran and that there was no threat of them getting a nuclear weapon. Considering that he lied openly to you about Obamacare, are you going to believe his current comments about an 'agreement' with a known terrorist country that openly hangs gays, stones women to death, and swears that they'll destroy a sovereign nation?
.
Saturday, March 14, 2015
Hillary's In It For The Money
Peggy Noonan recently wrote a very discerning article in the Wall Street Journal titled Hillary Seems Tired, Not Hungry. In it, Noonan details how Hillary's response to the email scandal seemed half-hearted. According to Noonan, Hillary's comments were "...the thrown-together mess of someone who knew she was guilty of self-serving action". And she's right.
Hillary doesn't care about being president. Nor does she care about serving the country. There's only one reason Hillary might run for office: Money.
Hillary only wants the money that comes with the presidency. First, as president, she can live in the mansion that is the White House. Everything is paid for: all the food, cooking, cleaning, dishes, furniture, utilities, travel, and entertainment. *Everything* is paid for. In addition, she would get the president's salary: at least $400,000 per year. So all she has to do every morning is get up, sit through boring meetings, and then assign tasks to someone else.
Then there's the income after she's out. First, the pension. She'll receive her entire salary for the rest of her life. That's $500,000 per year. Add in Bill's pension of $400,000 per year, and the two of them are collecting almost $1 Million per year in pension payments alone, all paid for by you and me.
$500,000 per hour:
Then, as the "first woman president", she can bump up her speaking fee from $300,000 per speech to $500,000 per speech. She could easily charge half-a-million-dollars for one speech. So if she gave two speeches per month she'd be pulling in $1 Million per month, which is $12 Million per year. And she would, of course, have the payments made to the Clinton Foundation, so it would only be taxed at 5%. So she would collect $11,400,000 per year. And that's on top of her pension and her other sources of income.
Don't let yourself be fooled. If Hillary runs for president, she's doing it for the money. She doesn't care about "women's rights" or minorities or anything else. Hillary cares about Hillary. She's in it to get the big bucks so she can retire after four years, collect her $13 Million per year and spend the rest of her life swaggering in front of her uber-rich friends. Because when your life is as empty as Hillary's, you'll do anything to feel like you're important.
Hillary doesn't care about being president. Nor does she care about serving the country. There's only one reason Hillary might run for office: Money.
Hillary only wants the money that comes with the presidency. First, as president, she can live in the mansion that is the White House. Everything is paid for: all the food, cooking, cleaning, dishes, furniture, utilities, travel, and entertainment. *Everything* is paid for. In addition, she would get the president's salary: at least $400,000 per year. So all she has to do every morning is get up, sit through boring meetings, and then assign tasks to someone else.Then there's the income after she's out. First, the pension. She'll receive her entire salary for the rest of her life. That's $500,000 per year. Add in Bill's pension of $400,000 per year, and the two of them are collecting almost $1 Million per year in pension payments alone, all paid for by you and me.
$500,000 per hour:
Then, as the "first woman president", she can bump up her speaking fee from $300,000 per speech to $500,000 per speech. She could easily charge half-a-million-dollars for one speech. So if she gave two speeches per month she'd be pulling in $1 Million per month, which is $12 Million per year. And she would, of course, have the payments made to the Clinton Foundation, so it would only be taxed at 5%. So she would collect $11,400,000 per year. And that's on top of her pension and her other sources of income.
Don't let yourself be fooled. If Hillary runs for president, she's doing it for the money. She doesn't care about "women's rights" or minorities or anything else. Hillary cares about Hillary. She's in it to get the big bucks so she can retire after four years, collect her $13 Million per year and spend the rest of her life swaggering in front of her uber-rich friends. Because when your life is as empty as Hillary's, you'll do anything to feel like you're important.
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
Unions Get Screwed by Obamacare
Obama's fervent supporters, the unions, are suddenly getting bitch-slapped with Obamacare taxes and penalties....and they don't like it:
"20,000 longshoremen are threatening to strike over a new Obamacare tax. Obamacare imposes a 40 percent tax on health benefits deemed too generous by the government. Health benefits exceeding $10,200 a year in value for individuals or $27,500 for families are defined as “Cadillac” plans and are subject to the tax. Health benefits for longshoremen exceed $40,000 per employee, meaning the union would be served an enormous tax bill when the penalty is imposed in 2018."
http://moonbattery.com/?p=55114
Hey union members, did you honestly think you would be spared the punishing taxes and fees of Obamacare? Ha!
Suckers!
What did Obama tell you: "If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your plan"? And you fell for it. Or did you think that only "the rich" would get taxed? Yeah, well, YOU are "rich" according to Obama.
I love listening to liberals scream. It's music to my ears. Now let's see if they'll finally rise up against Obama and Obamacare. Doubtful, though. They'll just move on to the next hoax.
"20,000 longshoremen are threatening to strike over a new Obamacare tax. Obamacare imposes a 40 percent tax on health benefits deemed too generous by the government. Health benefits exceeding $10,200 a year in value for individuals or $27,500 for families are defined as “Cadillac” plans and are subject to the tax. Health benefits for longshoremen exceed $40,000 per employee, meaning the union would be served an enormous tax bill when the penalty is imposed in 2018."
http://moonbattery.com/?p=55114
Hey union members, did you honestly think you would be spared the punishing taxes and fees of Obamacare? Ha!
Suckers!
What did Obama tell you: "If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your plan"? And you fell for it. Or did you think that only "the rich" would get taxed? Yeah, well, YOU are "rich" according to Obama.
I love listening to liberals scream. It's music to my ears. Now let's see if they'll finally rise up against Obama and Obamacare. Doubtful, though. They'll just move on to the next hoax.
Friday, August 15, 2014
The Ferguson Frankenstein's Monster
In Mary Shelley's classic novel 'Frankenstein', Shelley warns against creating a 'monster', because the monster will turn against the creator sooner or later.
The Democrats have spent decades creating a monster called 'hate whitey', and now it's turning against them.
Hillary
was the first to get slammed; in 2008 Hillary thought she had the presidential election sewn
up, but an unqualified community agitator beat her because he was
black, and anything she said could be construed as "racist". So after
her fighting for 40 years portraying "whitey" as "the enemy", she gets recognized as "whitey", the "enemy" and Obama gets elected. (That's what I call poetic justice, by the way).
Now, the unrest and rioting in Ferguson, MO, is the 'monster' turning against its creator. The shouts of "Obama, you ain't done sh*t for us!" and "Al Sharpton, f*ck you!" ring through the streets like a clarion call to the angry masses. The shooting of the teenager started it, but the frustration and anger of the people are what's driving it. And that anger is the realization that black people have gotten screwed by the Democrats, and now they're waking up to that reality.
The
tipping point was when Obama recently welcomed in millions of illegal
immigrants while blacks
are experiencing record crime and unemployment. Black activists are
demanding to
know why Obama is giving the illegals $4.7 Billion to help them
"assimilate", but nothing to the black people. Well, blacks, it's
because the illegals are future Democrat voters! Your usefulness is
used up, so now it's time for them to exploit a new minority.
The black community is
finally waking up; the Democrats are the problem, not "whitey". All these years the
Democrats have been promising the black community that they'd help them
to prosperity and solve all their problems, and all these years they haven't. Crime and unemployment have soared in the black community, and all they've gotten is lip service from the Democrats.
It's all come to a boiling point, and the anger is being directed right where it belongs; toward the Democrats.
Friday, March 9, 2012
California: Throwing Money Down the Drain
California has the highest taxes in all of the states. Ever wonder where it goes?
Well, for one, here:
"Xavier De La Torre, 48, was confirmed Wednesday afternoon as [Santa Clara County, California's] top educator. He will be paid $299,500 annually, plus receive a $12,000 annual auto allowance and, with at least a satisfactory performance in the first year, $20,000 more toward purchase of pension credits. His salary will rise automatically every July by the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for the Bay Area. … De La Torre is also being offered a $1 million home loan, half at 2 percent and half at 3 percent interest rates. The board will also advance him $25,000 for moving expenses."
And this is odd, too, considering that in other parts of the state, teachers are being laid off. For example, the Paso Robles school district just laid off 30 teachers. And in 2011 they laid off 52 teachers, citing "budget shortfalls".
I used to live in California. Every election cycle the state would put a proposition on the ballot for $15 to $20 Billion for "schools", because the schools (a) were falling apart, (b) overcrowded, (c) had very outdated textbooks, and a host of other things. Within the last few years I lived there, they had asked for, and gotten, $35 Billion in taxpayer money for the schools. But the schools never got improved; they were still falling down, they were still overcrowded, and the textbooks were still outdated.
After reading that story, I now know where the money is going. California is being "schooled" all right...but not in the manner that the citizens had hoped.
.
Well, for one, here:
"Xavier De La Torre, 48, was confirmed Wednesday afternoon as [Santa Clara County, California's] top educator. He will be paid $299,500 annually, plus receive a $12,000 annual auto allowance and, with at least a satisfactory performance in the first year, $20,000 more toward purchase of pension credits. His salary will rise automatically every July by the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for the Bay Area. … De La Torre is also being offered a $1 million home loan, half at 2 percent and half at 3 percent interest rates. The board will also advance him $25,000 for moving expenses."
And this is odd, too, considering that in other parts of the state, teachers are being laid off. For example, the Paso Robles school district just laid off 30 teachers. And in 2011 they laid off 52 teachers, citing "budget shortfalls".
I used to live in California. Every election cycle the state would put a proposition on the ballot for $15 to $20 Billion for "schools", because the schools (a) were falling apart, (b) overcrowded, (c) had very outdated textbooks, and a host of other things. Within the last few years I lived there, they had asked for, and gotten, $35 Billion in taxpayer money for the schools. But the schools never got improved; they were still falling down, they were still overcrowded, and the textbooks were still outdated.
After reading that story, I now know where the money is going. California is being "schooled" all right...but not in the manner that the citizens had hoped.
.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)