Showing posts with label liberal mental illness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label liberal mental illness. Show all posts

Saturday, September 5, 2015

Democrat Frankenstein Attacks its Creator Again

"Black Lives Matter" shuts down California Governor Jerry Brown's office:

"Occupiers from Black Lives Matter and the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) descended upon California’s capitol Wednesday by the hundreds, demanding state legislators pass a new bill on racial profiling, and calling on Governor Jerry Brown to sign it.  Chants from the crowd shown in video posted to social media included, “Justice, If we don’t get it, shut it down” ."

Once again, we see the Democrat Frankenstein's Monster turning on its creator. Jerry and the Democrats have been nurturing these radical crowds for decades and targeting them toward conservatives. These are
the same people who rioted in Oakland, San Francisco, and Los Angeles; smashing store windows, burning police cars, assaulting people, and shutting down freeways. It was fine then because they were speaking "the will of the people".  The problem is, when you pander to groups like this they'll turn on you.  And now they've turned on the Democrats.


Jerry Brown is facing a real problem. He's going to have to address this problem sooner or later because now they're invading his precious fortress where he used to be safe from these unwashed masses.  So I wonder: When he addresses the mob, is he going to deliver the same kind of condescending put-down to this group that he does to the people who don't want his high-speed rail or increased taxes?  I doubt it.

It doesn't matter anyway. No matter what Jerry or the Democrats say, it won't be good enough. The crowd will just get bigger, louder, and more violent.  Congratulations, Jerry. Your chickens have come home to roost.


(Here's Part One, in case you're interested.)
.

Sunday, July 19, 2015

Democrat Frankenstein Attacks Its Creator

The Democrat's Frankenstein's monster has turned on its creator.

Last Saturday, Democrat candidates Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley spoke at a rally of the Netroots. Or at least, they *tried* to speak. Partway into their presentations, screeching screaming black activists shouted down both Marty O'Malley and Bernie Sanders.

From the article:
"Angry, emotional Black Lives Matter activists took the stage to screech that black people are “in a state of emergency” over police violence, a position that has been shown to be statistically inaccurate but that led to violent clashes and riots in cities like Ferguson and Baltimore, where O’Malley served as mayor. As people shouted from the audience at him, O’Malley tried to respond but was continually shouted down."

Ha! It sucks to be on the receiving end, doesn't it, leftists? Welcome to what you created! Did you honestly think the emotionally-driven activists would focus just on conservatives? If so, you're idiots. They focus on ALL white people - so you're the enemy no matter how much free stuff you give them.

Then there's this:
>Both discussions were moderated by revered “Undocuqueer”  journalist Jose Antonio Vargas.  On his Facebook page, Vargas gave his thoughts on the event:  "I wish I had more time with both O’Malley and U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders. I particularly wanted to ask Sanders about his positions on gun control, climate change, and LGBTQ rights."<

So Sanders and O'Malley face not only irate blacks, but angry illegals and gay activists too. And these activists demand answers to every issue that the Dems have flung at the Republicans: gun control, "police brutality", climate change, and "gay rights".

HAHAHAHAHA!  Good luck coming up with an "acceptable" answer to those, you stupid liberal politicians!  You'll find out that there are *no* acceptable answers for screaming lefty activists! You'll be put through the wringer giving them answers that will only make them angrier, louder, and more violent.

I look forward to watching Bernie and O'Malley drown in the sea of slime that they created.
.

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Bernie Sanders: Raise Taxes to 90%!

Bernie Sanders, Communist candidate for the Democrat Party, wants to tax "the rich" at 90%.


You go first, Bernie. Let's see you pay 90% of all your income into the government: your salary, your perks, your other income (like rental property), - ALL of it: 90% goes to the government.  Then convert all your assets like your multiple houses, yachts, etc. into cash and pay 90% of that to the government.  C'mon Bernie, show us the courage of your convictions.

Bernie's argument is: "It worked in the 1950's". OK, fine!  Let's go back to the 1950's.  Let's bring back ALL the things you love about the 50's.  Such things as:
  • Racial segregation.  
  • No women's lib: they cooked, cleaned, and raised the kids.
  • Men ruled the household. What they said was law.
  • Children were disciplined. They could get spanked by teachers, cops, anyone.
  • Television didn't exist.
  • No gun control: everyone could carry a weapon out in the open.
  • A huge reduction in taxes.  At least 75% of the taxes that exist now didn't exist then.
  • A huge reduction in regulations.  At least 75% of the regulations that exist now didn't exist then.
  • No pollution regulations.
  • No environmental regulations.
  • No gays.
  • No welfare.
  • No government programs like food stamps.
  • Everyone went into the military.
  • Everyone went to church.
  • Girls stayed home until they were married.
  • Men had to prove their worth to the father before they could even date their daughters.  If they wanted to marry the daughter, they had to prove they had a good job, and they had to get permission from the father.
  • No pre-marital sex.
  • Many marriages were arranged.  The girls had no choice.
  • Illegal aliens were rounded up and deported en masse. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wetback
If the liberals want to bring back the 1950's taxation, then they can bring back ALL of the 50's.  I'm sure no liberals will complain.  Because it isn't just one thing that made the 50's work - it was a lot of things.  

If Bernie is unwilling to do that, then he can stuff it.
.

Friday, February 13, 2015

Hillary is Disqualifed by the Mainstream Media

The associated press circled the wagons around Brian Williams by writing a piece designed to absolve his lying, and preemptively absolve all Democrat liars.

What it did, though, is disqualify Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate.

From the article: "Hillary Rodham Clinton said she misspoke after claiming that she landed in Bosnia under sniper fire in 1996, a memory that turned out to be untrue."

Specifically, Hillary claimed that she had landed at an airport in Bosnia under sniper fire.  She claimed that the helicopter she was in had to do a spiral maneuver to land, and then they ran to the terminal in order to avoid sniper fire.

In reality, the landing was uneventful.  In fact, a photo showed up on the Internet of what really happened: Hillary was greeted on the tarmac by a little girl.  There's a huge difference between getting shot at and meeting a little girl.  You don't "misremember" being shot at.

If we are to believe that Hillary had "a memory that turned out to be untrue", then Hillary obviously has serious memory problems.  You don't forget getting shot at.  Or not shot at.

If Hillary has memory problems that are that bad, then she is unqualified to be president.  A president who "mis-remembers" getting shot at, versus meeting a little girl at an airport, can't be trusted with critical national security information.  Hillary, with her faulty memory, is liable to spill all our national secrets to the first rogue nation she meets with.


Here's the article.  Judge for yourself:  http://yhoo.it/19flcLi


Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Trey Gowdy for Attack Dog!

 I just marvel at the fact that Hillary is actually preparing a run for president. That woman has NOTHING to go on. She's totally unqualified.  She has NOTHING in her background that is applicable to the job she's applying for.

Oh sure, she was a Senator, but she did nothing (except bring higher unemployment to New York state.  That is, admittedly, something. But not something *positive*).  And as Secretary of State she REALLY did nothing.  For four years she did absolutely nothing.  Well, she did two things:
1. Misspell a "reset" button for Russia, so it said "overcharge". Demonstrating that she doesn't double-check her work before doing launching her program.
2. Let four Americans be brutally slaughtered by terrorists in Benghazi, then hide for several weeks so she could rehearse her answers to the investigating Senate committee.

I'd like to see Trey Gowdy run for president just so he could debate her.  She needs to be ripped to shreds in front of America over and over again until it sinks into the heads of even the feeblest of liberal brains that they're about to elect someone who has NO experience at ALL.  I don't care how many times she says it, it's impossible to learn how to be president - an executive - a manager of the highest level - just by talking to your husband at night. 

Scenario:
I'd like to see Trey Gowdy just rip her into little pieces: "Mrs. Clinton, you get a phone call that a mob of terrorists, all armed with AK-47's, have swarmed off a large ship in Miami, and are now in the lobbies of several large hotels, spraying bullets everywhere and brutally murdering everyone in sight. And now they're going room-to-room and slaughtering men, women, and children, all while screaming "Allahu Ackbar!".   What will you do?  What will you do RIGHT NOW???"

Hitlery would say something like "Well, I don't think that..." or "Before we do anything we'd have to..."

Trey jumps in:  "No, we KNOW what you would do. You'd do the same thing you did in Benghazi: NOTHING!  You would HIDE YOUR HEAD and hope that things worked out so you could take credit, and you would meet with your advisers to come up with someone else to blame.  In Benghazi you let four innocent Americans DIE!  Three brave Marines fought for seven hours and repeatedly begged for help, and you let them DIE!  HOW MANY AMERICAN HAVE TO DIE, MRS. CLINTON, BEFORE YOU'LL ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING??  Ten?  Twenty?  One Hundred???  How many? Tell us, right now, how many Americans have to die before you think it's a problem???"

But you know that's not going to happen. Instead we'll get Jeb Bush:
Hillary: "You're rich!"
Jeb: "Um...uh...well.." (hangs head and looks guilty).

So prepare for Queen Hillary.  And by "prepare" I mean: "Buy ammo and survival gear, and be ready for the Second American Revolution".
.

Friday, January 16, 2015

Obama the Dangerous Laughingstock

  • One week ago, 12 French writers were shot to death by Islamic terrorists.
  • Last Sunday, world leaders and 1 Million+ French people marched in Paris to show solidarity against terrorism.
  • On that day, Hussein Obama performed a *huge* gaffe: he skipped attending the France march so that he could watch football.  And he didn't send anyone from his administration.  The world noticed Obama, and America's, absence.

So what does Obama do, now that he realizes his huge political blunder?

He sends John Kerry to France, along with James Taylor so they can sing "You've got a friend" to the French people.


 Reuters

Unbelievable.  Totally un-f**king-believable.

Of all the childish, ineffective, and idiotic things Obama has done, this is the lowest he's ever sunk.  People are being murdered in France by terrorists, other Western countries are being threatened, and all the European people are rising up against it en masse, and the little man-child thinks that singing a song is going to fix his biggest blunder and convince France that we're on their side???  What a f**king idiot.

Obama needs to be removed from office now, before he does any more damage.

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Protestors Threaten to Set Reporter on Fire

In 2008 and 2012 the LameStream Media twisted the news in order to get an unqualified community organizer elected president. In 2014 the LameStream Media twists and distorts the news in order to portray rioting thugs and vandals as "peaceful protestors".

Now the Frankenstein's Monster is turning on its creator. "Peaceful protestors" today threatened to set a local reporter on fire.

From the article: "Demonstrators at the protest began to threaten members of the media covering the vigil. One woman said she would set a KTLA photographer on fire."

And yet, the LameStream Media still sticks to their story about how the protestors are merely frustrated citizens who just want "justice".  Considering that news reporters covering protests are repeatedly beaten and robbed, I assume that the credo of the LameStream Media is "We'll bring you biased coverage, no matter how many reporters we have to go through".

Here's the story:
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2014/12/30/protesters-threaten-to-set-local-news-photographer-on-fire/


Sunday, December 28, 2014

How's that working out for you?


The whole "Black Lives Matter" thing has been going like mad for a couple of months now.  It's calmed down in most cities, but there are a few in which it is still going strong.  In fact, the protestors have moved on from just marching to violence.

But these are also the cities that are run by liberals. These are the cities who have been lecturing us "neandarthals" about how we have to 'evolve'; rather than face violence with violence, we need to "dialogue" with the rioters in order to make sure they feel their voices are heard. They will, of course, lay down their arms and be peaceful from that point forward.

Let's look into three liberal cities, to see how well this policy is working:

1. Hey liberal-run Portland: How's that "be nice to the protesting liberals and they'll sit down with you and talk out their grievances" policy working out for you?


2. Hey liberal-run New York: How's that "leave the protestors alone and instead indict your own police" policy working out for you?


3. Hey liberal-run Los Angeles: How's that "offer to 'dialogue' with the protestors, and they'll respect you and stop protesting" policy working out for you?

Yeah, that's what we figured.  This liberal canard is just a bunch of hokum, just like all the other liberal canards.  Being nice to rioters just causes more rioting and violence. 

That's why I'd much rather live in so-called (by liberals) 'racist' and 'backwards' Arizona.  Because we have a Sheriff who will arrest all rioting scumbags we have quiet streets, and any protestors *will* sit down and discuss things with the other side. After all, calm negotiation is much better than roasting in 110-degree heat in Sheriff Joe's infamous Tent City prison.
 

Thursday, August 1, 2013

Democrats fighting for Democrats: Women Suffer

CNN has an article about the Mayor Filner case:
"A lawyer for San Diego Mayor Bob Filner criticized the city for not providing sexual harassment training to the mayor, saying its failure to do so violated the law."

This should be entertaining!  

A Democrat mayor has been caught sexually harassing the women on his team.  But now it's suggested that the Democrats in the city of San Diego didn't train him in sexual harassment avoidance, so he "didn't know".  Meanwhile, it's also the responsibility of the person who's being harassed to attempt to stop it immediately, which is looks like they may not have done

So where are the feminists? Where is NOW?  Because they have a real quandary on their hands:
1. They usually rise up to protect "womyn" from sexual harassment.
2. But this guy's a Democrat, which means:
3. They have to admit that a Democrat can actually do something wrong.
4. Which they won't do.

So here's what will happen:
  • The women who've been harassed will be dumped like yesterday's garbage and have to live with the humiliation the rest of their lives. 
  • The mayor will get off scot-free except for the big payoff he'll get from suing the city, some of which he'll pay out to NOW for keeping their mouths shut.  He'll also get a job in the new Hillary administration because he's "learned from his mistakes".
  • NOW will also sue the city and collect millions in the name of "womyn everywhere" (except the women who were harassed).
  • The Lamestream Media will stay totally silent on this because it directly opposes their "republican war on women" meme.

Life is good in Democrat Utopia! Except, of course, for honest citizens.

If the women who were being harassed had had any brains, they would have blackmailed the mayor.  Big payoffs from a scared Democrat are much more lucrative than keeping your job.


Sunday, July 14, 2013

Zimmerman Acquittal: Libs Hoisted by Their Own Petard

George Zimmerman has been found not guilty on all charges of the shooting death of Trayvon Martin.  And predictably, like the 4-year-olds that they are, the leftists are screeeeeeaaaming about how it was "injustice".

It's justice all right.  All of the evidence pointed to George Zimmerman's account being the truth, and no matter what the left says, Trayvon attacked Zimmerman and got shot for his actions.

But here's the real reason the leftists are really upset: they can't turn this into a racial thing because no white men were involved.

  • Zimmerman is Hispanic: A Race That Can't Be Racist.
  • Martin is black: A Race That Can't Be Racist.
  • The jury was all-women: A Gender That Does No Wrong.

So the libs are in a quandry because there's nobody to blame.  Oh, what to do, what to do?  Can't blame the evil white people because none were involved.

The leftists have painted themselves into a corner.  Here we have two minorities (protected classes Who Can Do No Wrong) who clashed and had an outcome.  Since they're minorities, though, racism wasn't involved.  The jury was composed of all women and the judge was a woman (a protected class Who Can Do No Wrong).

The libs have been hoisted by their own petard.  All their work trying to make the white race the evil doers of the world and all minorities as saints has backfired - a minority is dead and another minority is acquitted and goes free.

It's a dark day for the liberals. Their beloved schema of All Minorities Are Guilt-Free Because Of The Color Of Their Skin has fallen apart today.




Monday, May 6, 2013

Rubio's Amnesty Plan Will Cost You $5,575.00 per Year

Grateful illegals
 Marco Rubio (Democrat) is still pushing his amnesty bill.  He calls it “immigration reform”, but it’s really an amnesty bill that’s loaded up with extra spending, especially in his home state of Florida.

I want to focus on the most egregious part of this plan: the cost.   Not much has been said about this, and yet it’s crucial that we understand it, because it’s devastating.

The Heritage Foundation has calculated that Rubio's amnesty plan  would cost $6.3 TRILLION dollars.

Cost of Being Screwed by Illegals
Let’s figure out how much we, the individual person, will pay each year in taxes to give the illegals amnesty.

Rubio’s Amnesty bill will cost American taxpayers $6.3 TRILLION dollars.
$6.3 Trillion/ 113 Million (taxpayers) = $55,752.00 per taxpayer.

But that's "over ten years". Here's how that breaks out:
$55,752/10 = $5,575.00 per taxpayer every year.
$5,575.00/12 = $464.00 per month

Do YOU have an extra $500 per MONTH to give to the government?  Given your bills and expenses, and rising gas and food prices, do YOU have an extra $500 per month to pay the government so they can forgive and then legalize 20 Million lawbreakers?  Yeah.  I don't either.

Better life for them, worse life for you
Pro-illegals say that illegals are here to “make a better life for themselves”.  Yeah?  But will it make YOUR life better to be losing an additional $500 every month?  No. It’ll make YOUR life worse. But the Democrats really don’t care. They think it’s funny.  They’ve just gotten you to pay for 20 Million new voters for them.

Do you now see the corruption in Washington?  They come up with a plan to get 20 Million new voters and they force YOU to pay for it.

And by “force”, I MEAN “force”. Realize this: that $500 isn’t something you can refuse to pay.  It’s a TAX.  You HAVE to pay it.  It’s the law that you pay taxes.  If you don’t pay it, the IRS will take over your bank accounts, garnish your wages, and take your house and car and sell them to pay the taxes.  You have NO CHOICE.  If this bill passes, you MUST pay that extra $500 every month.


This has got to stop. Call your Senator.  Tell him or her that you won’t support them again, and you’ll actively work to turn the illegals against them.  Call ALL the Senators.  The general switchboard number is: (202) 224-3121.  Call them and tell them to vote NO.  And clog their emails and faxes with messages.  If they give you some kind of curt answer, then call your local conservative talk radio show and let them know how you were treated. If enough people start shaming Congress, they’ll think twice about their vote.

We have to stop this amnesty plan. This will cost you and me and everyone an extra $500 per month, every month. You could buy a new car with that. Don’t lose your freedom or your comfort just because some Democrat wants an easy way to get more votes.  Call your Senator and help put a stop to this NOW.


Thursday, April 11, 2013

Ending the Gun Control Debate

The politicians are taking up the debate about gun control, better known as just "control".  VP Joke Biden asked this question: "What are we doing to impact on a gun owners' right if he only has a clip with ten rounds in it instead of 30 rounds in it?""

Hey Joke, we need 30 round clips for protection from things like:

1. A gang of 200 "teens" who rampaged through downtown Philadelphia yesterday.  http://tinyurl.com/bnquah2

2. A mob of 500 "teens" who rioted on Chicago's Magnificent Mile assaulting cops, robbing people, and beating pedestrians: http://tinyurl.com/d2cu3k7

 3. A mob of 3,000 "young people" rioting at Ford City Mall: http://tinyurl.com/d6oxhxj

We can't protect ourselves by (Biden's words) "shooting through the door" when there's a mob of 3,000 scumbags headed our way.  A 30-round clip will put a lot of those animals down for good, and the others will be a lot more likely to steer clear of us when we do.

If Joke Biden was serious about what he says, then he'll take the guns away from all the Secret Service people who are protecting him.  If he won't do that, then he can STFU.


Friday, February 15, 2013

Liberal Mental Ilness on Display

The staggering depth of mental illness of liberals sank in to me today.  Not that I hadn't realized it earlier, but this really did it for me. Here's how liberals think:

1. Their hero, Hussein Obama, ignores Americans being slaughtered by terrorists in Benghazi and goes to bed.  Upon rising he realizes that he made a huge blunder, so he creates a lie about the attack being caused by a YouTube video and then arrests and imprisons an innocent man for the lie.  That innocent man is still in prison for a phony crime: something that never happened.  To libs, this is NOT a scandal.

2. A GOP spokesperson takes a sip of water during a television appearance.  To libs, this is a HUGE scandal.


I swear, when the Second American Revolution happens, I'll have no problem rounding up liberals and selling them as slaves to North Korea.  People who are that stupid have no place in civilized society.