The 2016 Election was Thrown from the Start....until now.
(Part One is here)
Next, the Democrats:
Hillary was the chosen candidate for the Democrats ever since she and Bill Clinton left office many years ago. During the years of GW Bush, she became a Senator and made herself obvious by raucously shrieking out against Bush whenever she could. When Bush was out of office she ran for president, hoping her loudness would carry her through. She was not expecting Barack Obama to be pushed to the front by the Mainstream Media. So after a short fight she dropped out of the race and let Obama be elected.
During that time she served as the Secretary of State where she did nothing but let four Americans be butchered by terrorists and then lie about it. But while all this was happening, she and the GOP were carefully laying the groundwork for her election. The two parties got together and started their subtle campaigning to make Hillary look like the Chosen One, and Bush to be the Fall Guy.
Hillary’s Past Catches Up With Her:
Two things happened that have Hillary losing in the polls.
1. The email scandal.
Hillary has been caught red-handed in a huge scandal that involves national security. She’s been accused of selling American uranium to the Russians, and selling arms to the rebels in Syria via Benghazi. Congressional investigations into these matters have revealed Hillary for who she really is: conniving, vindictive, lying, and uncaring. Her shouting “What difference does it make???” may have been intended to make the Republicans look petty, but it backfired. Since it had been proven that Hillary lied to cover up the Benghazi killings, millions of Democrats saw her as she really is, and they saw *their* kids being sent off to die in a war that Hillary most likely had set up so that she could make a big profit from it. And no parent, with even a shred of love for their children, wants that.
2. The rise of Bernie Sanders.
The dumbing-down of American children has created the “gimme” society of young people. They don’t want to work – they want everything handed to them. They see anyone who’s successful as “evil”, and they want the worked-hard-for salaries taken away from those evil people and given to them.
But even the dumbest of “gimme” kids can see that Hillary is a grasping, clutching, in-it-for-herself witch that would, at best, dole out only crumbs to the serfs. The gimme generation wants it all, and it’s obvious that Hillary would keep as much of the money as she could.
So in comes Bernie Sanders. Bernie is an outspoken socialist. His entire platform is “I’ll raise taxes to 90% on the rich people and give it to all the “poor” people”. Free college! Free everything! This rings true with the gimme generation. They expect everything to be free, and so they side with Bernie. As a result, Bernie is surging in the polls and Hillary is dropping behind.
But the DNC is determined to place Hillary as president, so they’re doing everything they can to prevent her being seen as a grabby witch. Specifically, they’re NOT letting her out into public, and they’re NOT holding debates. They’re just going to push her into the nomination no matter what the voters say.
This is not going over well with the Democrat voters. They’re demanding more debates between the candidates, and the DNC is turning them down. The DNC is determined to push Hillary into the nomination, and they’re using their tried-and-true method of “do what we tell you to do, serfs”. Unfortunately for them, they’re getting pushback. If the DNC forces Hillary into the nomination, a lot of Democrat voters will stay home and not vote. Hillary will not get elected. Bernie Sanders will have a shot at the presidency because of Democrats either doing a write-in campaign or stuffing the ballot boxes.
In Summary:
The political elites thought they had the outcome of the 2016 election decided many years ago. Unfortunately for them, those plans have been thrown into turmoil. The American People are speaking out, they’ve found candidates they prefer, and they’re not sitting idly by.
What will happen next? That remains to be seen. For the Republicans, I see Donald Trump surging ahead until he’s nominated. Jeb Bush is sinking in the polls and his campaign financers are beginning to back out. So if the GOP tries to push Bush into the nomination, there will be more than idle complaining; there will be disruptive action: marches, protests, phone-banks, etc. If that doesn’t work, then there will probably be a write-in campaign and Trump will be elected no matter what the GOP wants.
As for the Democrats, Bernie Sanders will keep surging forward. Hillary is sinking in the polls, as evidenced by her campaign appearances are her speaking to half-empty rooms. However the DNC will continue to push her as the nominee. Come hell or high water, they’re going to push Hillary into that position. If they do, there will be violence in the streets; all the groups that want socialism will be in the streets setting fires and destroying buildings, just like they’ve been trained to do by the DNC. And on election night, a lot of Democrats will stay home because they’re tired of being conned by the DNC into voting for a candidate they don’t want.
Final Analysis:
The 2016 election is the death-knell for both the GOP and the DNC. Americans have had enough of the political elites telling them “We know best. Sit down, shut up, give us all your money, and do as we tell you”. With the rejection of the “chosen by the elites” candidates and the surge in popularity of the new candidates, the old politics is dead. Washington no longer has a grip on the American people. The old politicians would be wise to pack their bags and get out while the getting is good.
Showing posts with label Idiot Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Idiot Democrats. Show all posts
Monday, September 21, 2015
Saturday, September 5, 2015
Democrat Frankenstein Attacks its Creator Again
"Black Lives Matter" shuts down California Governor Jerry Brown's office:
"Occupiers from Black Lives Matter and the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) descended upon California’s capitol Wednesday by the hundreds, demanding state legislators pass a new bill on racial profiling, and calling on Governor Jerry Brown to sign it. Chants from the crowd shown in video posted to social media included, “Justice, If we don’t get it, shut it down” ."
Once again, we see the Democrat Frankenstein's Monster turning on its creator. Jerry and the Democrats have been nurturing these radical crowds for decades and targeting them toward conservatives. These are
the same people who rioted in Oakland, San Francisco, and Los Angeles; smashing store windows, burning police cars, assaulting people, and shutting down freeways. It was fine then because they were speaking "the will of the people". The problem is, when you pander to groups like this they'll turn on you. And now they've turned on the Democrats.
Jerry Brown is facing a real problem. He's going to have to address this problem sooner or later because now they're invading his precious fortress where he used to be safe from these unwashed masses. So I wonder: When he addresses the mob, is he going to deliver the same kind of condescending put-down to this group that he does to the people who don't want his high-speed rail or increased taxes? I doubt it.
It doesn't matter anyway. No matter what Jerry or the Democrats say, it won't be good enough. The crowd will just get bigger, louder, and more violent. Congratulations, Jerry. Your chickens have come home to roost.
(Here's Part One, in case you're interested.)
.
"Occupiers from Black Lives Matter and the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) descended upon California’s capitol Wednesday by the hundreds, demanding state legislators pass a new bill on racial profiling, and calling on Governor Jerry Brown to sign it. Chants from the crowd shown in video posted to social media included, “Justice, If we don’t get it, shut it down” ."
Once again, we see the Democrat Frankenstein's Monster turning on its creator. Jerry and the Democrats have been nurturing these radical crowds for decades and targeting them toward conservatives. These are the same people who rioted in Oakland, San Francisco, and Los Angeles; smashing store windows, burning police cars, assaulting people, and shutting down freeways. It was fine then because they were speaking "the will of the people". The problem is, when you pander to groups like this they'll turn on you. And now they've turned on the Democrats.
Jerry Brown is facing a real problem. He's going to have to address this problem sooner or later because now they're invading his precious fortress where he used to be safe from these unwashed masses. So I wonder: When he addresses the mob, is he going to deliver the same kind of condescending put-down to this group that he does to the people who don't want his high-speed rail or increased taxes? I doubt it.
It doesn't matter anyway. No matter what Jerry or the Democrats say, it won't be good enough. The crowd will just get bigger, louder, and more violent. Congratulations, Jerry. Your chickens have come home to roost.
(Here's Part One, in case you're interested.)
.
Sunday, July 19, 2015
Democrat Frankenstein Attacks Its Creator
The Democrat's Frankenstein's monster has turned on its creator.
Last Saturday, Democrat candidates Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley spoke at a rally of the Netroots. Or at least, they *tried* to speak. Partway into their presentations, screeching screaming black activists shouted down both Marty O'Malley and Bernie Sanders.
From the article:
"Angry, emotional Black Lives Matter activists took the stage to screech that black people are “in a state of emergency” over police violence, a position that has been shown to be statistically inaccurate but that led to violent clashes and riots in cities like Ferguson and Baltimore, where O’Malley served as mayor. As people shouted from the audience at him, O’Malley tried to respond but was continually shouted down."
Ha! It sucks to be on the receiving end, doesn't it, leftists? Welcome to what you created! Did you honestly think the emotionally-driven activists would focus just on conservatives? If so, you're idiots. They focus on ALL white people - so you're the enemy no matter how much free stuff you give them.
Then there's this:
>Both discussions were moderated by revered “Undocuqueer” journalist Jose Antonio Vargas. On his Facebook page, Vargas gave his thoughts on the event: "I wish I had more time with both O’Malley and U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders. I particularly wanted to ask Sanders about his positions on gun control, climate change, and LGBTQ rights."<
So Sanders and O'Malley face not only irate blacks, but angry illegals and gay activists too. And these activists demand answers to every issue that the Dems have flung at the Republicans: gun control, "police brutality", climate change, and "gay rights".
HAHAHAHAHA! Good luck coming up with an "acceptable" answer to those, you stupid liberal politicians! You'll find out that there are *no* acceptable answers for screaming lefty activists! You'll be put through the wringer giving them answers that will only make them angrier, louder, and more violent.
I look forward to watching Bernie and O'Malley drown in the sea of slime that they created.
.
Last Saturday, Democrat candidates Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley spoke at a rally of the Netroots. Or at least, they *tried* to speak. Partway into their presentations, screeching screaming black activists shouted down both Marty O'Malley and Bernie Sanders.
From the article:
"Angry, emotional Black Lives Matter activists took the stage to screech that black people are “in a state of emergency” over police violence, a position that has been shown to be statistically inaccurate but that led to violent clashes and riots in cities like Ferguson and Baltimore, where O’Malley served as mayor. As people shouted from the audience at him, O’Malley tried to respond but was continually shouted down."
Ha! It sucks to be on the receiving end, doesn't it, leftists? Welcome to what you created! Did you honestly think the emotionally-driven activists would focus just on conservatives? If so, you're idiots. They focus on ALL white people - so you're the enemy no matter how much free stuff you give them.
Then there's this:
>Both discussions were moderated by revered “Undocuqueer” journalist Jose Antonio Vargas. On his Facebook page, Vargas gave his thoughts on the event: "I wish I had more time with both O’Malley and U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders. I particularly wanted to ask Sanders about his positions on gun control, climate change, and LGBTQ rights."<
So Sanders and O'Malley face not only irate blacks, but angry illegals and gay activists too. And these activists demand answers to every issue that the Dems have flung at the Republicans: gun control, "police brutality", climate change, and "gay rights".
HAHAHAHAHA! Good luck coming up with an "acceptable" answer to those, you stupid liberal politicians! You'll find out that there are *no* acceptable answers for screaming lefty activists! You'll be put through the wringer giving them answers that will only make them angrier, louder, and more violent.
I look forward to watching Bernie and O'Malley drown in the sea of slime that they created.
.
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Bernie Sanders: Raise Taxes to 90%!
Bernie Sanders, Communist candidate for the Democrat Party, wants to tax "the rich" at 90%.
You
go first, Bernie. Let's see you pay 90% of all your income into the
government: your salary, your perks, your other income (like rental
property), - ALL of it: 90% goes to the government. Then convert all
your assets like your multiple houses, yachts, etc. into cash and pay
90% of that to the government. C'mon Bernie, show us the courage of
your convictions.
Bernie's argument is: "It worked in the 1950's". OK, fine! Let's go back to the 1950's. Let's bring back ALL the things you love about the 50's. Such things as:
- Racial segregation.
- No women's lib: they cooked, cleaned, and raised the kids.
- Men ruled the household. What they said was law.
- Children were disciplined. They could get spanked by teachers, cops, anyone.
- Television didn't exist.
- No gun control: everyone could carry a weapon out in the open.
- A huge reduction in taxes. At least 75% of the taxes that exist now didn't exist then.
- A huge reduction in regulations. At least 75% of the regulations that exist now didn't exist then.
- No pollution regulations.
- No environmental regulations.
- No gays.
- No welfare.
- No government programs like food stamps.
- Everyone went into the military.
- Everyone went to church.
- Girls stayed home until they were married.
- Men had to prove their worth to the father before they could even date their daughters. If they wanted to marry the daughter, they had to prove they had a good job, and they had to get permission from the father.
- No pre-marital sex.
- Many marriages were arranged. The girls had no choice.
- Illegal aliens were rounded up and deported en masse. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wetback
If the liberals want to bring back the 1950's
taxation, then they can bring back ALL of the 50's. I'm sure no liberals will complain. Because it isn't
just one thing that made the 50's work - it was a lot of things.
If Bernie is unwilling to do that, then he can stuff it.
.
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
Protestors Threaten to Set Reporter on Fire
In 2008 and 2012 the LameStream Media twisted the news in order to get an unqualified community organizer elected president. In 2014 the LameStream Media twists and distorts the news in order to portray rioting thugs and vandals as "peaceful protestors".
Now the Frankenstein's Monster is turning on its creator. "Peaceful protestors" today threatened to set a local reporter on fire.
From the article: "Demonstrators at the protest began to threaten members of the media covering the vigil. One woman said she would set a KTLA photographer on fire."
And yet, the LameStream Media still sticks to their story about how the protestors are merely frustrated citizens who just want "justice". Considering that news reporters covering protests are repeatedly beaten and robbed, I assume that the credo of the LameStream Media is "We'll bring you biased coverage, no matter how many reporters we have to go through".
Here's the story:
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2014/12/30/protesters-threaten-to-set-local-news-photographer-on-fire/
Now the Frankenstein's Monster is turning on its creator. "Peaceful protestors" today threatened to set a local reporter on fire.
From the article: "Demonstrators at the protest began to threaten members of the media covering the vigil. One woman said she would set a KTLA photographer on fire."
And yet, the LameStream Media still sticks to their story about how the protestors are merely frustrated citizens who just want "justice". Considering that news reporters covering protests are repeatedly beaten and robbed, I assume that the credo of the LameStream Media is "We'll bring you biased coverage, no matter how many reporters we have to go through".
Here's the story:
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2014/12/30/protesters-threaten-to-set-local-news-photographer-on-fire/
Thursday, August 1, 2013
Democrats fighting for Democrats: Women Suffer
CNN has an article about the Mayor Filner case:
"A lawyer for San Diego Mayor Bob Filner criticized the city for not providing sexual harassment training to the mayor, saying its failure to do so violated the law."
"A lawyer for San Diego Mayor Bob Filner criticized the city for not providing sexual harassment training to the mayor, saying its failure to do so violated the law."
This should be entertaining!
A
Democrat mayor has been caught sexually harassing the women on his
team. But now it's suggested that the Democrats in the city of San Diego
didn't train him in sexual harassment avoidance, so he "didn't know".
Meanwhile, it's also the responsibility of the person who's being
harassed to attempt to stop it immediately, which is looks like they may not have done.
So where are the feminists? Where is NOW? Because they have a real quandary on their hands:
1. They usually rise up to protect "womyn" from sexual harassment.
2. But this guy's a Democrat, which means:
3. They have to admit that a Democrat can actually do something wrong.
4. Which they won't do.
So here's what will happen:
- The women who've been harassed will be dumped like yesterday's garbage and have to live with the humiliation the rest of their lives.
- The mayor will get off scot-free except for the big payoff he'll get from suing the city, some of which he'll pay out to NOW for keeping their mouths shut. He'll also get a job in the new Hillary administration because he's "learned from his mistakes".
- NOW will also sue the city and collect millions in the name of "womyn everywhere" (except the women who were harassed).
- The Lamestream Media will stay totally silent on this because it directly opposes their "republican war on women" meme.
Life is good in Democrat Utopia! Except, of course, for honest citizens.
If
the women who were being harassed had had any brains, they would have
blackmailed the mayor. Big payoffs from a scared Democrat are much more
lucrative than keeping your job.
Monday, July 29, 2013
Obama's Technology of the Future
A head-on train crash in Switzerland
has injured 40 people:
I'm SO glad the all-wise, all-seeing, all-knowing Barack Hussein Obama has decreed that trains shall be the technology of the future. Based on all the news reports lately, they're as safe as a vacation at the embassy in Benghazi!
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
It's all Al Gore's Fault
Today Vice President Joke Biden praised former Vice President Al Gore, asserting that Gore had actually won the the 2000 presidential election.
“This man was elected president of the United States of America,” Biden said according to the pool report. “He was elected president of the United States of America. But for the good of the nation, when the bad decision in my view was made, he did the right thing for the nation.” “I can’t think of very many who would put his country first like that, at a really, really, really difficult time,” he said. “There’s an awful lot of folks Al and I both know who have run for president and still haven’t gotten over it.”
If that's the case, then it's obvious that Obama "inherited the worst economy since the Great Depression" from Al Gore. And everything that's gone wrong all through Obama's term was caused by Al Gore.
- Record unemployment, especially of blacks? Gore's fault.
- 3,000 people died in the WTC on 9/11? Gore's fault.
- Record number of children in poverty? Gore's fault.
- Americans' real income dropping 55%? Gore's fault.
- Gas price jumped from $1.85/gallon to $3.85/gallon: Gore's fault.
Thanks, libs, for pointing out who is really at fault in all of this. We know it's not Obama because he's admitted that he doesn't know spit about anything. From the IRS targeting conservative groups to the NSA listening in on your phone calls and reading your emails, Obama reads about it in the newspaper. So this is obviously all Al Gore's fault.
So get out into the street and start protesting against Al Gore. After all, he caused all this.
.
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Chicago is Liberal Utopia
Want to know how the Hussein admistration, and indeed, all liberals see the future? And how they're going to "solve" all the problems that they create?
Then read this article about crime in Chicago:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57470618/chicago-police-sergeant-tribal-warfare-on-the-streets
Check out Rahm Imanuel's interview at the bottom. Liberal stupidity at its best! "Murders are up 38%, but overall crime is down 10%". No, overall crime is UP 28%!
Notice Rahm's method of solving the crime problem: close the liquor stores which are "magnets" for gang bangers. In other words, close down legitimate businesses rather than go after the criminals. And be sure to watch it at about 2:00 where Rahm appeals to the "values" of the gang bangers. "Don't stop killing each other, just go into the alley and kill each other." Oh yeah...that'll do it!
This shows off exactly what happens when liberals take over; crime skyrockets, children are killed, and the only method that the libs in command try is "talking" to the criminals. Pathetic. And it's what's in store for us if we don't stop the spread of liberalism.
Well, in the blue states, anyway. Here in the red states we still arm our citizens and shoot criminals. Sorry about your state.
.
Then read this article about crime in Chicago:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57470618/chicago-police-sergeant-tribal-warfare-on-the-streets
Check out Rahm Imanuel's interview at the bottom. Liberal stupidity at its best! "Murders are up 38%, but overall crime is down 10%". No, overall crime is UP 28%!
Notice Rahm's method of solving the crime problem: close the liquor stores which are "magnets" for gang bangers. In other words, close down legitimate businesses rather than go after the criminals. And be sure to watch it at about 2:00 where Rahm appeals to the "values" of the gang bangers. "Don't stop killing each other, just go into the alley and kill each other." Oh yeah...that'll do it!
This shows off exactly what happens when liberals take over; crime skyrockets, children are killed, and the only method that the libs in command try is "talking" to the criminals. Pathetic. And it's what's in store for us if we don't stop the spread of liberalism.
Well, in the blue states, anyway. Here in the red states we still arm our citizens and shoot criminals. Sorry about your state.
.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)